Bernie Sanders Says, “Tax the Rich!” Yes, But How Much?

Bernie Sanders wants the rich to pay more taxes, aiming to support the working class and diminish the influence of billionaires. His proposal is to introduce an annual tax only for those with a net worth of more than $32 million.

Sanders is definitely on to something. His website says:

Over the last 30 years, the top 1 percent has seen a $21 trillion increase in its wealth, while the bottom half of American society has actually lost $900 billion in wealth. In other words, there has been a massive transfer of wealth from those who have too little to those who have too much.

He is right about this. We are living today in one of the periods of most income inequality in United States history. Inflation outpaces income for almost all working-class people. Eviction, out-of-control healthcare costs, and outrageous student loan debts are among the attacks we face. Meanwhile, the rich don’t have to worry about these things and enjoy one of the lowest taxation periods in the last 200 years.

But would the tax Sanders proposes break the concentration of wealth and power? His proposed tax of one percent on $32 million to eight percent on over $10 billion would leave 99% and 92%, respectively, to the wealthy. They would still be filthy rich and definitely still in power. Why propose to take only this much?

Sanders seems to follow the idea that minor reforms like this one look more realistic, like something that can be seriously discussed in Congress. But let’s be honest; it’s not realistic to think that Congress would do anything like this unless there was a mass movement in the streets and probably a general strike of workers across the country. And if that happened, why would we stop at one percent and eight percent? By making so-called “modest” proposals like this, the bosses’ politicians try to keep people relying on the legislative process rather than organizing to win our demands on our own terms.

The majority of us do the work that produces everything, including the profits of the wealthy few. Their wealth should belong to and benefit all of society. At the end of the day, the real question is not what tax laws can get through Congress, as much as Sanders’s proposal suggests this. It’s whether the working class is ready to hold the ruling class accountable.

We must take what belongs to us.

Related Posts

Trump Escalates Cuba Sanctions with EO 14404

At the beginning of May, Trump signed Executive Order 14404, imposing yet another host of sanctions on Cuba, in addition to the existing oil blockade. The Executive Order is titled “Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy,” and significantly

Read More »

The Ebola Outbreak as a Legacy of Imperialism

A new Ebola outbreak is spreading through the Democratic Republic of Congo and neighboring Uganda. Hundreds have already died, and health authorities are racing to contain the disease. For many outside Africa, outbreaks like this are seen as another unfortunate but inevitable natural disaster. A dangerous virus appears, people become

Read More »

Pollute More and Get Paid

California is giving free emission permits, allowing big polluters to pollute more and reducing the money available for transit, housing, and other programs.

Read More »

Los dos hombres que creen que pueden gobernar el mundo

La reciente reunión en China entre Trump y el presidente chino, Xi Jinping, acaparó la atención de los medios de comunicación de todo el mundo. Se informó con todo detalle sobre el lugar de la reunión, lo que comieron y quiénes los acompañaron. Se presentó como el encuentro entre las

Read More »

What is Happening with the General Strike in Bolivia?

This is a translation of a synthesis of three articles by Rafael Santos of the Partido Obrero (Workers’ Party) in Argentina, published on its website, Prensa Obrera on May 23, 2026. Its analyses are those of a Trotskyist current, with information and perspective that should be interesting to our readership.

Read More »