The New York Times reports that Amazon is planning to eventually replace 600,000 jobs with robots by 2033. Amazon’s robotics team has a goal of being able to automate 75% of its operations.

If Amazon is successful in automating away blue-collar jobs, other companies such as Walmart and UPS are likely to do the same in order to remain competitive.

Amazon’s executives know that automation will hurt people, because they are already planning greater corporate participation in community events to wash its reputation in communities that would be most impacted by job losses.

Why should workers be hurt by increased efficiency? What if instead of becoming unemployed, workers could benefit from their productivity by having more free time, or by getting paid more?

Under capitalism, the benefits of better technology directly benefit the company owners, because they own the productivity gains and the associated increased profits. Sometimes the increased productivity might allow executives to afford to throw some scraps to the workers in the form of higher wages as long as market conditions permit company growth. Eventually though, they must feel the pressure to maximize profits, which means cutting jobs they deem as unnecessary. Any harm to real people that they do in the process isn’t their problem.

Bill Gates, former CEO of Microsoft and once the richest person, recognized that better technology might reduce the amount of work people need to do and that something would need to change. In March 2025, he suggested that people could work “2 or 3 days a week” within 10 years, thanks to artificial intelligence. As a capitalist, he surely knows that this can’t happen under capitalism. If necessary labor can really be automated away this effectively, then instead of everybody getting more free time, what is more likely to happen is that half of the workers, now unnecessary to the system, will simply be unemployed, and they can starve to death for all the system cares about them.

If we want labor-saving technology to benefit us, we need to change the system—away from capitalism, to one in which the workers are empowered to make decisions about their own workplaces and larger society.

Related Posts

Trump Escalates Cuba Sanctions with EO 14404

At the beginning of May, Trump signed Executive Order 14404, imposing yet another host of sanctions on Cuba, in addition to the existing oil blockade. The Executive Order is titled “Imposing Sanctions on Those Responsible for Repression in Cuba and for Threats to United States National Security and Foreign Policy,” and significantly

Read More »

The Ebola Outbreak as a Legacy of Imperialism

A new Ebola outbreak is spreading through the Democratic Republic of Congo and neighboring Uganda. Hundreds have already died, and health authorities are racing to contain the disease. For many outside Africa, outbreaks like this are seen as another unfortunate but inevitable natural disaster. A dangerous virus appears, people become

Read More »

Pollute More and Get Paid

California is giving free emission permits, allowing big polluters to pollute more and reducing the money available for transit, housing, and other programs.

Read More »

Los dos hombres que creen que pueden gobernar el mundo

La reciente reunión en China entre Trump y el presidente chino, Xi Jinping, acaparó la atención de los medios de comunicación de todo el mundo. Se informó con todo detalle sobre el lugar de la reunión, lo que comieron y quiénes los acompañaron. Se presentó como el encuentro entre las

Read More »

What is Happening with the General Strike in Bolivia?

This is a translation of a synthesis of three articles by Rafael Santos of the Partido Obrero (Workers’ Party) in Argentina, published on its website, Prensa Obrera on May 23, 2026. Its analyses are those of a Trotskyist current, with information and perspective that should be interesting to our readership.

Read More »